IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-0-387-28014-1_11.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Prior Distributions for Bayesian Analysis of Screening Experiments

In: Screening

Author

Listed:
  • Hugh Chipman

    (Acadia University, Department of Mathematics and Statistics)

Abstract

When many effects are under consideration in a screening experiment, it may be necessary to use designs with complex aliasing patterns, especially when interactions and higher-order effects exist. In this situation, the selection of subsets of active effects is a challenging problem. This chapter describes Bayesian methods for subset selection, with emphasis on the choice of prior distributions and the impact of this choice on subset selection, computation, and practical analysis. Attention is focused on experiments where a linear regression model with Gaussian errors describes the response. Ideas are illustrated through an experiment in clinical laboratory testing and through an example with simulated data. Advantages of the Bayesian approach are stressed, such as the ability to incorporate useful information about which subsets of effects are likely to be active. For example, an AB interaction effect might only be considered active if main effects for A and B are also likely to be active. When such information is combined with a stochastic search for promising subsets of active effects, a powerful subset selection tool results. The techniques may also be applied to designs without complex aliasing as a way of quantifying uncertainty in subset selection.

Suggested Citation

  • Hugh Chipman, 2006. "Prior Distributions for Bayesian Analysis of Screening Experiments," Springer Books, in: Angela Dean & Susan Lewis (ed.), Screening, chapter 11, pages 236-267, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-0-387-28014-1_11
    DOI: 10.1007/0-387-28014-6_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-0-387-28014-1_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.