IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-0-387-24555-3_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The Statistical Significance of Palm Beach County

In: Statistical Modeling and Analysis for Complex Data Problems

Author

Listed:
  • David Andrews
  • Andrey Feuerverger

Abstract

This paper emphasizes certain issues and problems that arise when a statistical analysis must be undertaken on complex and evolving data, under tight constraints of time. In such circumstances, it typically is not possible to develop extensive or problem-specific methodology, yet an answer may be required almost immediately, and must be correct, defensible, understandable, and carry impact. It must also be able to withstand the test of comparison with analyses yet to come. We illustrate these points by presenting the background to, and an analysis of, the State of Florida results in the 7 November, 2000 U.S. Presidential elections with emphasis on Palm Beach County. The analysis we discuss was carried out in the days immediately following that election. The statistical evidence strongly suggested that the use of the ‘butterfly’ ballot in Palm Beach County had resulted in a significant number of votes having been counted for presidential candidate Pat Buchanan which had not so been intended. The design of the ‘butterfly’ ballot suggests that many of these votes had likely been intended for the Democratic candidate Al Gore. This confusion was sufficient to affect the overall outcome of the 2000 U.S. Presidential election, conferring the office to George W. Bush, and this result is statistically significant.

Suggested Citation

  • David Andrews & Andrey Feuerverger, 2005. "The Statistical Significance of Palm Beach County," Springer Books, in: Pierre Duchesne & Bruno RÉMillard (ed.), Statistical Modeling and Analysis for Complex Data Problems, chapter 0, pages 17-40, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-0-387-24555-3_2
    DOI: 10.1007/0-387-24555-3_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-0-387-24555-3_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.