IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-0-306-47467-5_79.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Intersubjectivty in Interpretive Research: The Dialogical Case

In: Synergy Matters

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Stephens

    (University of the West of England, Faculty of Computer Studies and Mathematics)

Abstract

In this paper the concept of intersubjectivity as it is employed in Information Systems research is reviewed from the perspective of dialogism developed in the work of Mikhail Bakhtin. A form of communicative understanding is presupposed in most IS analytic activities; intersubjectivity is the general criteria for interpretive studies that are acclaimed by the attempt to understand phenomena according to the meanings that people assign to them. Typically, it is said to be achieved empathetically by the generation of shared interpretations of the actions, practices and objects within the cultural systems that give them significance. The quality of engagement between participants is increasingly regarded as a key element in successful IT development, for example Participant Design, Joint Application Development, cooperative and interpretive methodologies, all recommend that system development is enhanced by user participation, albeit in varying degrees of involvement, and authenticity of analytic categories is assured in common understanding. In Bakhtin’s dialogic concept, this engagement, though welcome, is not an option but an epistemological requirement. However, the convergence of understanding in shared alterity (otherness) is radically resisted, and there is an insistence that difference must always exist for meaning to have any authenticity. This implies a rejection of both the foundationalism of the Other’s viewpoint, as well as the notion of synthesis found in many reports of intersubjectivity. Instead of privileging the understanding of one or another person, whereby one agent (the informant) possesses knowledge or truth and the other (the researcher) acquires it, a focus on the interaction between the two is recommended. Interpretivism and hermeneutics are understood as a response to the other, a ‘giving-meaning-to’ the alterity presented by an other culture or person’s understanding and action rather than an overcoming of the difference presented by the Other.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Stephens, 2002. "Intersubjectivty in Interpretive Research: The Dialogical Case," Springer Books, in: Adrian M. Castell & Amanda J. Gregory & Giles A. Hindle & Mathew E. James & Gillian Ragsdell (ed.), Synergy Matters, chapter 79, pages 469-474, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-0-306-47467-5_79
    DOI: 10.1007/0-306-47467-0_79
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-0-306-47467-5_79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.