IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-0-306-47467-5_102.html

An Empirical Study of EIS Satisfaction — some Preliminary Findings

In: Synergy Matters

Author

Listed:
  • Xianzhong M. Xu

    (University of Luton, Luton Business School)

Abstract

Conclusion Current EISs failed to systematically scan, process and provide meaningful information to senior managers engaged in strategic decision making, which has been seen the main cause leading to EIS dissatisfaction. The design of current EISs concentrates a great deal on technical issues, i.e. ease of use, graphics capability, data access and drill-down features, this may not be attractive enough to get executives’ hands on the EISs. Rather, through EISs “to improve strategic information available to the top management team” appears essential to increase executives’ satisfaction. The EISs hence should be able to scan both external and internal information of relevance to executives (Heley and Watson, 1996; Vandenbosch and Huff, 1997; Frolick, et al. 1997), in particular, should be able to cater for soft, non-quantitative and highly aggregated information (Watson, et al. 1996). This can be implemented by embedding the EISs with information scanning facilities to scan both factual and soft information from the external environment, and tools for filtering and refining the received information. In addition, the “Information Support” role needs to be created as opposed to traditional IT support, to enhance senior executives’, as well as an organisation’s information scanning and processing capability.

Suggested Citation

  • Xianzhong M. Xu, 2002. "An Empirical Study of EIS Satisfaction — some Preliminary Findings," Springer Books, in: Adrian M. Castell & Amanda J. Gregory & Giles A. Hindle & Mathew E. James & Gillian Ragsdell (ed.), Synergy Matters, chapter 102, pages 607-612, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-0-306-47467-5_102
    DOI: 10.1007/0-306-47467-0_102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-0-306-47467-5_102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.