IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/spochp/978-3-030-84144-7_11.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Geophysical Sensors for Mapping Soil Layers – A Comparative Case Study Using Different Electrical and Electromagnetic Sensors

In: Information and Communication Technologies for Agriculture—Theme I: Sensors

Author

Listed:
  • Erika Lück

    (Institute of Geosciences)

  • Julien Guillemoteau

    (Institute of Geosciences)

  • Jens Tronicke

    (Institute of Geosciences)

  • Jana Klose

    (Institute of Geosciences)

  • Benjamin Trost

    (Leibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Bioeconomy (ATB))

Abstract

In agriculture, site-specific field management is based on several components including information regarding soil heterogeneity. Mobile geophysical sensors are useful tools to efficiently map the spatial distribution of physical parameters (e.g., electrical conductivity) for large areas (i.e., several hectares and more). In combination with the analysis of soil samples collected at selected points, these maps represent a database for decision-making, e.g., for programming and controlling fertilizer spreaders. In addition, multi-channel instruments not only provide data regarding lateral changes within a certain depth range, rather they also allow for reliable imaging of possible soil layers within the depth of investigation. The reliability of the geophysical parameter models (e.g., electrical conductivity model) is controlled by the conductivity and their contrasts and by the used sensor. A case study is presented in which the electromagnetic sensor DUALEM-21 is used at an agricultural field characterized by sandy soils (i.e., low electrical conductivity) including a relative homogeneous topsoil (i.e., with only minor differentiation). At our test site, the final geophysical parameter maps generated using DUALEM-21, are compared to the results obtained using a rolling electrode system (Geophilus) and ground-penetrating radar (GPR). All methods reveal similar patterns of soil heterogeneity. In addition, the conductivity-depth models resulting from kinematic surveys are in good agreement with those from conventional static electrical measurements and with the data from soil analysis of borehole samples. Thus, the results of our case study demonstrate that the DUALEM-21 can also be used successfully on sandy soils to map the lateral conductivity variation and possible layers within the root zone (i.e., the upper 1.5 m).

Suggested Citation

  • Erika Lück & Julien Guillemoteau & Jens Tronicke & Jana Klose & Benjamin Trost, 2022. "Geophysical Sensors for Mapping Soil Layers – A Comparative Case Study Using Different Electrical and Electromagnetic Sensors," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, in: Dionysis D. Bochtis & Maria Lampridi & George P. Petropoulos & Yiannis Ampatzidis & Panos Pardalos (ed.), Information and Communication Technologies for Agriculture—Theme I: Sensors, pages 267-287, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:spochp:978-3-030-84144-7_11
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-84144-7_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:spochp:978-3-030-84144-7_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.