IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/spbrcp/978-3-031-89557-9_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Comparison of the Most Important Soft Skills in Academic and Non-academic Sources

In: Soft Skills for the 21st Century

Author

Listed:
  • Jaroslava Kubátová

    (Palacký University Olomouc)

  • Michal Müller

    (Palacký University Olomouc)

  • David Kosina

    (Palacký University Olomouc)

  • Ondřej Kročil

    (Palacký University Olomouc)

  • Pavla Slavíčková

    (Palacký University Olomouc)

Abstract

This chapter, with two subchapters, compares the lists of most recommended soft skills from academic and non-academic sources and finds them to be largely identical. Other important findings presented in this chapter are the general agreement on the importance of soft skills as a prerequisite for a successful working life, and the fact that there is still no consistent definition of soft skills, nor their categorization or model. Based on these findings, further research in this area is suggested. It is emphasized that the research must be purely prospective, given the new circumstances that affect the current social and economic development. Therefore, the Delphi method is chosen for this research, which is presented in detail.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaroslava Kubátová & Michal Müller & David Kosina & Ondřej Kročil & Pavla Slavíčková, 2025. "Comparison of the Most Important Soft Skills in Academic and Non-academic Sources," SpringerBriefs in Business, in: Soft Skills for the 21st Century, chapter 0, pages 25-28, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:spbrcp:978-3-031-89557-9_4
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-89557-9_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:spbrcp:978-3-031-89557-9_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.