IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/spbchp/978-3-319-51061-3_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Descriptions of the Voting Methods to Be Analyzed

In: Monotonicity Failures Afflicting Procedures for Electing a Single Candidate

Author

Listed:
  • Dan S. Felsenthal

    (University of Haifa)

  • Hannu Nurmi

    (University of Turku)

Abstract

This chapter describes the 18 most well-known voting procedures for electing one out of several candidates. These procedures are divided into three groups: A group of five procedures that are vulnerable to non-monotonicity under both fixed and variable electorates: Plurality with Runoff, Alternative Vote, Coombs’ Method, Dodgson’s Method, Nanson’s Method. A group of eight procedures that are vulnerable to non-monotonicity under (only) variable electorates: Successive Elimination, Bucklin’s Method, Majority Judgment, Copeland’s Method, Black’s Method, Kemeny’s Method, Schwartz’s Method, Young’s Method. A group of five procedures that are invulnerable to any monotonicity failures: Plurality Voting, Approval Voting, Borda’s Count, Range Voting, the Minmax Method.

Suggested Citation

  • Dan S. Felsenthal & Hannu Nurmi, 2017. "Descriptions of the Voting Methods to Be Analyzed," SpringerBriefs in Economics, in: Monotonicity Failures Afflicting Procedures for Electing a Single Candidate, chapter 0, pages 11-22, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:spbchp:978-3-319-51061-3_2
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-51061-3_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:spbchp:978-3-319-51061-3_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.