IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/socchp/978-3-031-32507-6_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Cancel Culture and Novaya Etika in Russian Public Discourse

In: Internet in the Post-Soviet Area

Author

Listed:
  • Sergei A. Samoilenko

    (George Mason University)

  • Alina Eremina

    (HSE University)

  • Anton Gumensky

    (Moscow University of International Relations)

Abstract

Using the prism of moral conflict between conservative and progressive worldviews, this chapter seeks to examine how cancel culture practices in the West have influenced Russian public discourse society. This essay argues that there are two main perspectives on cancel culture in Russia. The traditionalist perspective dismisses cancel culture as an alien ideology that is harmful to the domestic system of conservative values. This perspective inevitably creates a moral conflict with Russian conservative attitudes, which are in line with the current ideological paradigm of the Russian state. The progressive perspective on cancel culture often justifies the extreme use of canceling in the name of social justice and other noble causes, frequently overlooking the consequences of public shaming campaigns. While cancel culture applies to a broad range of social issues, the chapter examines its effects inspired by the #MeToo movement across different organizational settings. The authors also discuss the use of novaya etika, a new term used by Russian traditionalist patriots and liberal cosmopolitans to make sense of debates in the West concerning changing views of history, culture, and morality.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergei A. Samoilenko & Alina Eremina & Anton Gumensky, 2023. "Cancel Culture and Novaya Etika in Russian Public Discourse," Societies and Political Orders in Transition, in: Sergey Davydov (ed.), Internet in the Post-Soviet Area, pages 71-87, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:socchp:978-3-031-32507-6_4
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-32507-6_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:socchp:978-3-031-32507-6_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.