Author
Abstract
The general objective of this study was to understand the possibilities and limitations of evaluations in active methodologies in various levels of entrepreneurial education, understanding, as pointed out by Lopes (Ensino de Empreendedorismo no Brasil: Panorama, tendências e melhores práticas. Rio de Janeiro: Alta Books, 2017), the use of methodologies that allow students to learn by doing is the foundation for the development of entrepreneurial competencies. To this end, an exploratory and descriptive research was conducted as a contribution to the discussion on the topic. The research was carried out in the public education network at the infant, primary, secondary, and tertiary levels in the municipalities of Arapiraca, Boca da Mata, and Jacaré dos Homens, all placed in the state of Alagoas, in the Brazilian Northeast. The data collection instrument was developed using Google Forms and sent to a population of 380 teachers. We received 180 valid responses, representing a sample of 47%. The data indicate that the education network studied is mostly composed of female teachers with diverse age ranges, with an increasing age representation concerning the level of education they teach. The level of education also increases concerning their teaching level. The data reveal that 63% of teachers seek to develop entrepreneurial competencies in their students, although only 26% emphasize the use of entrepreneurial education. Active methodologies are used, on average, by 46% of teachers, who use a variety of assessment possibilities at all levels of education. Resource scarcity, adequacy of physical spaces, and the number of students per class were pointed out as limitations.
Suggested Citation
Anderson de Almeida Barros & Andrea Karla Ferreira Nunes, 2026.
"Evaluation in Entrepreneurial Education: Possibilities and Limits,"
Studies on Entrepreneurship, Structural Change and Industrial Dynamics,,
Springer.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:seschp:978-3-032-17008-8_8
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-17008-8_8
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:seschp:978-3-032-17008-8_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.