IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/seschp/978-3-030-17238-1_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Effects of Innovation Efficiency and Knowledge on Industry-University Collaboration: An Evolutionary Game Perspective

In: Collaborative Innovation Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Yang Song

    (Jilin University)

  • Zhiyuan Zhang

    (Jilin University of Finance and Economics)

Abstract

This paper studies the “evolutionarily stable strategy” (ESS) between industry and university during collaborative innovation processes based on evolutionary games. By designing knowledge sharing models, we analyze the impact factors of knowledge input, knowledge transfer, and innovation cost on collaborative innovation. Furthermore, we use simulation to verify the knowledge sharing model. Our results suggest that the “open innovation strategy” is actually the fact that players choose “evolutionarily stable strategy” in the long-term collaborative innovation process. When the number of game players is different, the small group takes the lead in achieving stabilization strategy. When the number of game players is similar, both groups adopt the “open strategy” at the same speed. Besides, we also suggest that increasing knowledge spillover will contribute to innovation efficiency and stabilization. Theoretically, our study explains the stabilization strategy of the game and provides reasonable recommendations for policy makers.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang Song & Zhiyuan Zhang, 2019. "Effects of Innovation Efficiency and Knowledge on Industry-University Collaboration: An Evolutionary Game Perspective," Studies on Entrepreneurship, Structural Change and Industrial Dynamics, in: Yang Song & Francesca Grippa & Peter A. Gloor & João Leitão (ed.), Collaborative Innovation Networks, pages 143-161, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:seschp:978-3-030-17238-1_9
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-17238-1_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:seschp:978-3-030-17238-1_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.