IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/rischp/978-3-032-02302-5_3.html

Deliberative Democracy: Concepts and Implications

In: Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation

Author

Listed:
  • Ortwin Renn

    (GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences, Research Institute for Sustainability (RIFS))

  • Thomas Webler

    (Social and Environmental Research Institute)

  • Peter Wiedemann

    (Monash University, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine)

  • Pia-Johanna Schweizer

    (GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences, Research Institute for Sustainability (RIFS))

Abstract

This chapter examines the concept of deliberative democracy, focusing on how stakeholder and public involvement can enhance policymaking through structured, inclusive, and reflective discourse. Beginning with the definition of deliberation as argument- and reflection-based, the chapter explores its potential to restore legitimacy to political processes in an era marked by declining trust in traditional governance. Building on Habermasian discourse theory, it highlights the interplay between rational argumentation, diverse knowledge sources—including scientific expertise and experiential insights—and communitarian-oriented values. The discussion underscores the value of deliberation in clarifying conflicts, generating new solutions, and fostering consensus or at least mutual understanding. At the same time, it acknowledges obstacles such as power imbalances, representational challenges, and the risk of decision paralysis. Analytic–deliberative models and structured processes, such as Planning Cells and citizen forums, offer frameworks for integrating expert knowledge with public values, aiming to produce fair, feasible, and ethically grounded outcomes. Overall, the chapter contends that deliberative processes can enrich governance by promoting broader engagement, improved learning, and policy decisions aligned with the common good.

Suggested Citation

  • Ortwin Renn & Thomas Webler & Peter Wiedemann & Pia-Johanna Schweizer, 2025. "Deliberative Democracy: Concepts and Implications," Risk, Governance and Society, in: Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation, pages 33-66, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:rischp:978-3-032-02302-5_3
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-02302-5_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:rischp:978-3-032-02302-5_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.