IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/rischp/978-3-031-96436-7_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Reporting Catastrophes: Mainstream Media and Vulnerability to Disasters in the United States

In: Natural Disasters in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Natalie Rauscher

    (Würzburg University)

Abstract

As a country that experiences natural disasters on a regular basis, the United States today is highly vulnerable to these events—more so than other countries. What could be the reasons behind this high vulnerability and lack of resilience in the United States today? This chapter explores the role of mainstream media in disaster situations such as hurricanes by arguing that through the structure and focus of mainstream media in a politically polarized context, there is little reflection of underlying reasons for high risk and vulnerabilities to disaster including a lack of discussion of government policy in this area. By investigating a textual corpus of media data around natural disasters based on transcripts from the New York Times, ABC News, and Fox News between 2017 and 2020 using quantitative and qualitative methods from corpus linguistics, this chapter contributes to previous research illustrating that there is little reflection in US mainstream media of underlying causes of high vulnerability to disasters. This likely contributes to a lack of awareness of the origins of disaster situations as well as possibly an unwillingness to support political reform in this area. Media discourses thus play a crucial role in the cycle of failed disaster risk reduction in the United States.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalie Rauscher, 2025. "Reporting Catastrophes: Mainstream Media and Vulnerability to Disasters in the United States," Risk, Governance and Society, in: Natalie Rauscher & Welf Werner (ed.), Natural Disasters in the United States, pages 167-190, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:rischp:978-3-031-96436-7_9
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-96436-7_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:rischp:978-3-031-96436-7_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.