IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/prochp/978-3-319-29166-6_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

A Philosophical Comparison of Chinese and European Models of Computer Science Education. (A Discussion Paper)

In: Software Engineering Education Going Agile

Author

Listed:
  • C. C. H. Rosen

    (University of Derby)

Abstract

This paper applies a model of the learning process to a case study of teaching a Masters’ level, industry oriented software development project management course to a mixed group of Chinese and European students. By comparing levels of engagement of each group, the paper postulates the influence of the two academic cultures in their ability to deliver students capable of critical evaluation in an industry oriented environment. The paper concludes that both cultures face obstacles in dealing with academic administrations that adhere to traditional values and have failed to fully adjust to a new, contemporary paradigm.

Suggested Citation

  • C. C. H. Rosen, 2016. "A Philosophical Comparison of Chinese and European Models of Computer Science Education. (A Discussion Paper)," Progress in IS, in: Stephan Kassel & Bing Wu (ed.), Software Engineering Education Going Agile, pages 9-14, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:prochp:978-3-319-29166-6_2
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-29166-6_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:prochp:978-3-319-29166-6_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.