IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/prochp/978-3-319-10280-1_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Evaluating a Cloud Service Relationship Theory

In: Developing and Evaluating a Cloud Service Relationship Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Huntgeburth

    (Universität Augsburg)

Abstract

This chapter presents an empirical evaluation of the cloud service relationship theory based on a large scale survey. First, the context in which the cloud service relationship was evaluated is introduced and an explanation is given why PLS-SEM was chosen as a statistical method. Second, a comprehensive scale development study is presented that was very valuable for developing reliable and valid measurement instruments. Third, transparent record is provided on the sampling strategy and how the survey was administered. Fourth, the results of both measurement model and structural model evaluation are presented. Fifth, the findings are discussed in the light of the extant knowledge about IS and the theoretical contribution of the study is carved out. Last but not least, implications for practice are provided and limitations of the empirical evaluation are debated.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Huntgeburth, 2015. "Evaluating a Cloud Service Relationship Theory," Progress in IS, in: Developing and Evaluating a Cloud Service Relationship Theory, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 43-73, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:prochp:978-3-319-10280-1_4
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-10280-1_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Severin Oesterle & Jan Jöhnk & Robert Keller & Nils Urbach & Xin Yu, 2020. "A contingency lens on cloud provider management processes," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(3), pages 1451-1489, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:prochp:978-3-319-10280-1_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.