IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/prochp/978-3-030-46781-4_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

A Novel Approach to Collectively Determine Cybersecurity Performance Benchmark Data

In: Design Science Research. Cases

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Baskerville

    (Georgia State University)

  • Vijay Vaishnavi

    (Georgia State University)

Abstract

How do we determine cybersecurity performance benchmark data across organizations without the organizations revealing data points involving their frequency of information compromises? Disclosures of underlying data points are fundamentally inhibited by the need for privacy. It is a responsible organizational action to prevent the risk of expected or unexpected damages through data disclosure. Obtaining the data, especially valid and reliable data, necessary to calculate benchmarks, was thus an unsolvable wicked problem. The problem was therefore redefined as: How do we enable a distributed power-base of cybersecurity managers across organizations to collectively determine their benchmark data without actually disclosing their own data points? The core of the solution is a simple creative idea of having a protocol for a network of organizations to calculate benchmarks by distributing such calculations starting with some obfuscating data instead of centrally collecting the constituent data points of each organization. In this way, the confidential data of the organization would never be released beyond organizational systems. The fuller development of the protocol faced the issues of establishing trust in the network and preventing statistical compromises that were addressed through creative use of available technology, leading to the final solution, a distributed peer-to-peer architecture called Trusted Query Network (TQN). Distributed processing can induce trust and privacy into computer networks. In addition: (1) A research group representing multiple strengths and different but complementary backgrounds can be a very powerful asset in solving difficult problems. (2) Use of creativity is central to design science research but is particularly needed in solving apparently intractable problems. A group format can encourage free flow of ideas and brainstorming that are useful in spurring creativity. (3) It is very useful to be visionary in finding and solving challenging problems. Research groups provide the psychological strength to confront existing design challenges and to visualize their out-of-the-box solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Baskerville & Vijay Vaishnavi, 2020. "A Novel Approach to Collectively Determine Cybersecurity Performance Benchmark Data," Progress in IS, in: Jan vom Brocke & Alan Hevner & Alexander Maedche (ed.), Design Science Research. Cases, pages 17-41, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:prochp:978-3-030-46781-4_2
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-46781-4_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:prochp:978-3-030-46781-4_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.