IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/perchp/978-981-15-1350-3_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

National Electronic Health Record Systems and Consent to Processing of Health Data in the European Union and Australia

In: Legal Tech and the New Sharing Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Danuta Mendelson

    (Deakin University)

Abstract

This study focuses on the single most important regulatory aspect of data processingData processing, namely consentConsent to data processingData processing. It compares approaches to consentConsent under the General Data ProtectionData protection Regulation (EU 2016/679) of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal dataData (and on the free movement of such) (GDPR) in the context of European Union (EU) national electronic health record (NEHRNational Electronic Record Schemes (NEHR)) schemes (also referred to as “national digital health networks”) with the approach of the Australian national health record scheme called My Health Record (MHR)My Health Record (MHR). The GDPR, subject to derogation in limited circumstances, is binding on all 27 EU member countries. Under Articles 168 (2) and (7) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (2007), while the EU has a duty to “encourage cooperation between the Member States…to improve the complementarity of their health services in cross-border areas,” the European Union Member States retain the power to manage their own health services. However, in doing so, subject to narrow derogations, the management of their NEHRNational Electronic Record Schemes (NEHR) systems must conform to the GDPR. The GDPR governs the processing of dataData in any form including dataData contained in national electronic health systems (European Commission Recommendation on a European Electronic Health Record exchange format (C(2019)800) of 6 February 2019. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/recommendation-european-electronic-health-record-exchange-format . Accessed 13 May 2019). Given that, unlike the Australian MHRMy Health Record (MHR) scheme, national electronic medical/health records systems of EU Member States are at different stages of development, and that derogations enable a measure of variance in compliance, individual European systems will not be discussed. AustraliaAustralia is a non-EU jurisdiction, and does not have the European Commission’s certificate of adequate level of data protectionData protection (GDPR Article 45 empowers the European Commission to determine whether a country outside the EU offers an adequate level of data protectionData protection, whether by its domestic legislation or of the international commitments it has entered into. For further discussion, see below). One of the reasons for the absence of certification might be the effectively non-consensual nature of the My Health RecordMy Health Record (MHR) system that administers, collects, stores, and provides access to health and clinical dataData of Australians.

Suggested Citation

  • Danuta Mendelson, 2020. "National Electronic Health Record Systems and Consent to Processing of Health Data in the European Union and Australia," Perspectives in Law, Business and Innovation, in: Marcelo Corrales Compagnucci & Nikolaus Forgó & Toshiyuki Kono & Shinto Teramoto & Erik P. M. Vermeu (ed.), Legal Tech and the New Sharing Economy, pages 115-131, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:perchp:978-981-15-1350-3_7
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-1350-3_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:perchp:978-981-15-1350-3_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.