IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/paitcp/978-3-319-63743-3_12.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Governance, Transparency and the Collaborative Design of Open Data Collaboration Platforms: Understanding Barriers, Options, and Needs

In: Government 3.0 – Next Generation Government Technology Infrastructure and Services

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Hogan

    (National University of Ireland)

  • Adegboyega Ojo

    (Insight Centre for Data Analytics, National University of Ireland Galway)

  • Owen Harney

    (National University of Ireland)

  • Erna Ruijer

    (Utrecht University, School of Governance)

  • Albert Meijer

    (Utrecht University, School of Governance)

  • Jerry Andriessen

    (Wise & Murno Learning Research)

  • Mirjam Pardijs

    (Wise & Murno Learning Research)

  • Paolo Boscolo

    (Comune di Prato)

  • Elena Palmisano

    (Comune di Prato)

  • Matteo Satta

    (Issy-Média and Ville d’Issy-les-Moulineaux)

  • Jonathan Groff

    (CNRS – Telecom ParisTech)

  • Michael Baker

    (CNRS – Telecom ParisTech)

  • Françoise Détienne

    (CNRS – Telecom ParisTech)

  • Lukasz Porwol

    (Insight Centre for Data Analytics, National University of Ireland)

  • Vittorio Scarano

    (University of Salerno)

  • Delfina Malandrino

    (University of Salerno)

Abstract

Developments in open data have prompted a range of proposals and innovations in the domain of governance and public administration. Within the democratic tradition, transparency is seen as a fundamental element of democratic governance. While the use of open government data has the potential to enhance transparency and trust in government, realising any ideal of transparent democratic governance implies responding to a range of sociotechnical design challenges. In order to address these design challenges it is essential to adopt an interdisciplinary and stakeholder-engaged approach to research and innovation. In the current study, we describe a contextualist approach to the design of an open data collaboration platform in the context of an EU innovation project, focused on enhancing transparency and collaboration between citizens and public administrators through the use of open government data. We report on a collective intelligence scenario-based design process that has shaped the development of open data platform requirements and ongoing system engineering and evaluation work. Stakeholders across five pilot sites identified barriers to accessing, understanding, and using open data, and options to overcome these barriers across three broad categories: government and organisational issues; technical, data, and resource issues; and training and engagement issues. Stakeholders also expressed a broad variety of user needs across three domains: information needs; social-collaborative needs; and understandability, usability, and decision-making needs. Similarities and differences across sites are highlighted along with implications for open data platform design.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Hogan & Adegboyega Ojo & Owen Harney & Erna Ruijer & Albert Meijer & Jerry Andriessen & Mirjam Pardijs & Paolo Boscolo & Elena Palmisano & Matteo Satta & Jonathan Groff & Michael Baker & Franç, 2017. "Governance, Transparency and the Collaborative Design of Open Data Collaboration Platforms: Understanding Barriers, Options, and Needs," Public Administration and Information Technology, in: Adegboyega Ojo & Jeremy Millard (ed.), Government 3.0 – Next Generation Government Technology Infrastructure and Services, pages 299-332, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:paitcp:978-3-319-63743-3_12
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-63743-3_12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dejan Ravšelj & Lan Umek & Ljupčo Todorovski & Aleksander Aristovnik, 2022. "A Review of Digital Era Governance Research in the First Two Decades: A Bibliometric Study," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-27, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:paitcp:978-3-319-63743-3_12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.