IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/paitcp/978-1-4614-9982-4_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Generic Mechanisms Influencing e-Initiative Adoptions: Perceptions of Key Actors

In: Measuring E-government Efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Liptrott

    (Edge Hill University)

Abstract

This chapter draws on research into variables influencing Election Officers’ decision-making on e-voting adoption in the UK with additional data from a senior executive of the Association of Electoral Administrators (AEA). The qualitative research underpinned by the realist paradigm focused on the 2003 and 2007 e-voting pilot programmes. Following a review of relevant literature, the enquiry involved a series of semi-structured interviews with samples of Election Officers in authorities that joined the 2003 and 2007 pilot programmes and a sample of those who had declined to join. An interview with a senior executive of the AEA verified the findings. The results suggest a series of broad-based lessons that can be used to better inform e-government policy design. The lessons result from the limitations in the pilot evaluation strategy which failed to identify reasons that local authorities declined participation in the e-voting pilot programme. The conclusion suggests that the values and beliefs of actors involved in local e-policy adoption decision-making are pivotal. It further suggests that there are practical steps that, if taken by policymakers, have the potential to address mechanisms that influence against voluntary e-government policy adoption.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Liptrott, 2014. "Generic Mechanisms Influencing e-Initiative Adoptions: Perceptions of Key Actors," Public Administration and Information Technology, in: Manuel Pedro Rodríguez-Bolívar (ed.), Measuring E-government Efficiency, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 93-110, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:paitcp:978-1-4614-9982-4_6
    DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-9982-4_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:paitcp:978-1-4614-9982-4_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.