IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/nrmchp/978-3-031-90889-7_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Saving Little Swimmer, Jumper, and Digger: Three Survey Experiments Testing Kinship Appeals in Conservation Marketing

Author

Listed:
  • David S. Morris

    (College of Charleston)

  • Hector N. Qirko

    (College of Charleston)

Abstract

Addressing the plight of threatened and endangered species requires direct public appeals for resources, yet charitable contributions to environmental causes and organizations are low. Conservation organizations use a variety of marketing strategies to obtain resources from target audiences, but there remains a need for strategies that appeal to broad audiences. This Chapter explores whether kinship appeals, whereby species targeted for conservation are portrayed as kin to humans, are likely to successfully elicit positive feelings and resource contributions across a wide range of demographic and cultural differences. It does so by means of three survey experiments, each of which measured the willingness of respondents to aid a different imaginary species alternatively described by means of kin, anthropomorphic, or neutral terms. Our results indicate kinship appeals have a small but significant positive impact on willingness to support conservation efforts, as respondents presented the kinship appeal often report being more likely to donate to conservation efforts and tell a friend about the efforts. However, this impact appears to be limited by the charisma of the species targeted for conservation. While these results are mixed, they suggest the value of kinship appeals and survey experiments to further explore them and other conservation marketing strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • David S. Morris & Hector N. Qirko, 2025. "Saving Little Swimmer, Jumper, and Digger: Three Survey Experiments Testing Kinship Appeals in Conservation Marketing," Natural Resource Management and Policy,, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nrmchp:978-3-031-90889-7_6
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-90889-7_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nrmchp:978-3-031-90889-7_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.