IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/nrmchp/978-1-4614-9440-9_20.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Assessing the SEC Landscape and Moving Forward

In: Socio-Economic Considerations in Biotechnology Regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Karinne Ludlow

    (Monash University)

  • Stuart J. Smyth

    (University of Saskatchewan)

  • José Falck-Zepeda

    (International Food Policy Research Institute)

Abstract

Globally, innovation in the field of agriculture face numerous constraints, due to a number of factors. One of these constraints is the increased burden of regulation. Science-based regulation of GM crops has a unique set of challenges, which are further increased when socio-economic considerations are included as part of the regulatory framework. This chapter provides a synopsis of the chapter and offers some concluding thoughts on the future of GM crop commercializations.

Suggested Citation

  • Karinne Ludlow & Stuart J. Smyth & José Falck-Zepeda, 2014. "Assessing the SEC Landscape and Moving Forward," Natural Resource Management and Policy, in: Karinne Ludlow & Stuart J. Smyth & José Falck-Zepeda (ed.), Socio-Economic Considerations in Biotechnology Regulation, edition 127, chapter 20, pages 295-305, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:nrmchp:978-1-4614-9440-9_20
    DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-9440-9_20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Falck-Zepeda, Jose & Smyth, Stuart J. & Ludlow, Karinne, 2016. "Zen and the Art of Attaining Conceptual and Implementation Clarity: Socio-economic Considerations, Biosafety and Decision-making," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 17(2), pages 1-20, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nrmchp:978-1-4614-9440-9_20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.