IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/mgmchp/978-3-319-58307-5_16.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Mining the Usability of Process-Oriented Business Software: The Case of the ARIS Designer of Software AG

In: Business Process Management Cases

Author

Listed:
  • Tom Thaler

    (Institute for Information Systems (IWi) at the German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI)
    Saarland University)

  • Sabine Norek

    (Software AG)

  • Vittorio Angelis

    (Software AG)

  • Dirk Maurer

    (Software AG)

  • Peter Fettke

    (Institute for Information Systems (IWi) at the German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI)
    Saarland University)

  • Peter Loos

    (Institute for Information Systems (IWi) at the German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI)
    Saarland University)

Abstract

(a) Situation faced: The quality of the technical support of business processes plays an important role in the selection of corresponding software products. Against that background, software producers invest considerable capital and manpower in improving their business software’s usability with regard to customers’ needs and process-related requirements. However, existing approaches from the field of usability engineering generally require laboratory environments, which do not cover the real user behavior without limitations. Therefore, the case described here seeks to improve a user-centric UX approach based on the idea of automatic identification of real customer needs. (b) Action taken: For that purpose, the German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI) and Software AG analyzed the issues in the currently available UX process at Software AG. Research and practice were searched for additional approaches to the critical point of understanding the user. Finally, a four-step approach based on process mining, consisting of user monitoring, trace clustering, usage model derivation, and usage model analysis was conceptualized and evaluated in a user study. (c) Results achieved: The application of the developed approach showed high flexibility and scalability in terms of the level of detail. Despite the small number of participants, it was possible to identify several process-related software issues and to reduce significantly needed resources (e.g., cost and time). Hence, a promising alternative to the existing techniques of understanding was found, leading to important improvements regarding a comprehensive and continuous lifecycle. (d) Lessons learned: The adapted UX approach increases flexibility and a widens the spectrum to proceed to the development of a user-centric business software. Although the improved procedure had a promising performance for further application in production environments, there are some open questions, such as handling the possibly high amount of upcoming data or privacy aspects that must be addressed in the future. Independently and regarding the transferability to other application scenarios, promising potential were identified, such as a mechanism for controlling the software’s evolution, the inductive development of usage reference models, and an approach to measuring the ease of learning a new business software.

Suggested Citation

  • Tom Thaler & Sabine Norek & Vittorio Angelis & Dirk Maurer & Peter Fettke & Peter Loos, 2018. "Mining the Usability of Process-Oriented Business Software: The Case of the ARIS Designer of Software AG," Management for Professionals, in: Jan vom Brocke & Jan Mendling (ed.), Business Process Management Cases, pages 291-310, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:mgmchp:978-3-319-58307-5_16
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-58307-5_16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:mgmchp:978-3-319-58307-5_16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.