IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/mgmchp/978-3-319-54235-5_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Better Alternatives to Performance Appraisal in an Agile Context

In: The End of Performance Appraisal

Author

Listed:
  • Armin Trost

Abstract

The summary in the previous chapter was not very flattering for the annual performance appraisal. In hierarchical worlds, the annual performance appraisal only appears to work, to some degree, for very few benefits, while in agile settings, the traditional annual performance appraisal is largely a complete failure. Criticism of this instrument is nothing new, although various authors have focused on very different aspects. What we are now interested in, however, are the alternatives. Numerous authors who subscribe, at least in part, to the criticism of the annual performance appraisal see no possible alternatives. Well-known management mastermind Edward E. Lawler III hits the nail on the head in one of his blog entries for Forbes, entitled “Performance Appraisals Are Dead, Long Live Performance Management” (Lawler, 2012). He rightly states that talent management without systematic employee evaluation is inconceivable. He also mentions that goals are simply essential when it comes to successfully running any organisation, meaning companies which do not evaluate performance will not cope, whether they like it or not. And that’s why these sorts of instruments will continue to exist in the future. End of story.

Suggested Citation

  • Armin Trost, 2017. "Better Alternatives to Performance Appraisal in an Agile Context," Management for Professionals, in: The End of Performance Appraisal, chapter 6, pages 147-175, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:mgmchp:978-3-319-54235-5_6
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-54235-5_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:mgmchp:978-3-319-54235-5_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.