IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/mgmchp/978-3-319-38845-8_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Pure Beauty: The Case of The Body Shop

In: Business Model Pioneers

Author

Listed:
  • Kai-Ingo Voigt

    (Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg)

  • Oana Buliga

    (Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg)

  • Kathrin Michl

    (Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg)

Abstract

“In the factory we make cosmetics, in the store we sell hope”. This famous quote of Charles Revson, founder of the U.S. cosmetics giant Revlon, best describes the value proposition of incumbent cosmetics companies during the 1970s, when The Body Shop emerged. The business model of Revlon and of other beauty brands back then was based on the so-called “hope-in-a-bottle” formula (van Someren 2005), having strong emotional and aspirational features. Besides glamour cosmetics companies such as Revlon, a market niche for firms offering natural products was progressively emerging. The Body Shop was part of this latter movement and, beyond its cosmetics value proposition, made a long-lasting social impact. The Body Shop became the pioneer of socially aware beauty companies. Anita Roddick used trade in a revolutionary way, as an instrument for improving not only business practices, but also the world around. Her change drive was triggered by what she saw in the cosmetics industry: unrealistic product claims and questionable animal testing practices for new products. In the words of Roddick herself: “I watch where the cosmetics industry is going and then walk in the opposite direction”.

Suggested Citation

  • Kai-Ingo Voigt & Oana Buliga & Kathrin Michl, 2017. "Pure Beauty: The Case of The Body Shop," Management for Professionals, in: Business Model Pioneers, chapter 4, pages 25-39, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:mgmchp:978-3-319-38845-8_4
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-38845-8_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:mgmchp:978-3-319-38845-8_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.