IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/mgmchp/978-3-031-10104-5_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Kaizen (改善), Kaikaku (改革) and Innovation Management

In: Lean Management, Kaizen, Kata and Keiretsu

Author

Listed:
  • Marc Helmold

    (IU, International University of Applied Sciences)

  • Ayşe Küçük Yılmaz

    (Eskisehir Technical University)

  • Triant Flouris

    (Metropolitan College)

  • Thomas Winner

    (IU, International University of Applied Sciences)

  • Violeta Cvetkoska

    (Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje)

  • Tracy Dathe

    (Macromedia University)

Abstract

Kaizen’s philosophy is continuous improvement in small steps. But in reality, improvement is not uniform, but discontinuous, sometimes faster and sometimes slower. With Kaizen, we sometimes face major obstacles and get stuck. In this case, we have to change the system, the framework conditions, in order to be able to improve further. A concentrated effort is required to make a breakthrough for Kaizen. This method is referred to as Kaikaku and helps improve quality in production (Japanese 改革, Reformation, Transformation). Kaikaku is called “breakthrough kaizen” or “kaizen lightning”. Kaikaku means “revolution in thought and action” and “improvement of great significance” (Radenkovic et al., 2013). With a concentrated use of force, it temporarily accelerates the speed and scope of Kaizen. Kaizen is the continuous improvement of an activity with the purpose of increasing the performance in a production system, usually less than 20 or 30% in a given period of time (Radharmanan et al., 1996). Opposite of Kaizen is Kaikaku, which represents drastic change or radical improvement that is usually a result of big investments in technology and/or equipment (Imai, 1986). This way of making improvements can be considered impossible to constantly improve the process, so based on that, there is a need to conduct radical change in the company (Pfeffer, 1998). Kaikaku is not like Kaizen, which is started by all employees; Kaikaku usually starts from the top management of the company and then goes to lower levels of workers (Yamamoto, 2013). This is because Kaikaku represents crucial strategic changes. Table 2.1 compares Kaizen and Kaikaku (Helmold, 2021) and shows the differences between the two methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Marc Helmold & Ayşe Küçük Yılmaz & Triant Flouris & Thomas Winner & Violeta Cvetkoska & Tracy Dathe, 2022. "Kaizen (改善), Kaikaku (改革) and Innovation Management," Management for Professionals, in: Lean Management, Kaizen, Kata and Keiretsu, chapter 2, pages 19-25, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:mgmchp:978-3-031-10104-5_2
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-10104-5_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:mgmchp:978-3-031-10104-5_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.