IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/lnopch/978-981-99-3626-7_58.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Research on Emergency Decision Making Considering Decision-Maker Peference Based on Improved Regret Theory—A Case Study of Covid-19

In: Proceedings of the 27th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate

Author

Listed:
  • Yang Su

    (Anhui Jianzhu University
    Anhui Jianzhu University)

  • Sun Taibao

    (Anhui Jianzhu University)

Abstract

For public health emergencies, adopting different response plans often makes the emergencies develop in different ways. In this paper, we propose a methodology for emergency decision-making based on regret theory, which takes into account the preferences of decision-makers. In this paper, we first calculate the utility value of each solution (including the utility value of the loss caused by the emergency and the utility value of the cost incurred in implementing the solution); then, we calculate the regret value of the emergency solution to obtain the perceived utility value of the loss and cost incurred by the decision maker; then, we calculate the combined perceived utility of the emergency solution; then, based on the combined perceived utility, we add the decision maker’s Finally, an example study is presented to show that taking into account the decision maker’s preferences does have a significant impact on the choice of contingency decision.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang Su & Sun Taibao, 2023. "Research on Emergency Decision Making Considering Decision-Maker Peference Based on Improved Regret Theory—A Case Study of Covid-19," Lecture Notes in Operations Research, in: Jing Li & Weisheng Lu & Yi Peng & Hongping Yuan & Daikun Wang (ed.), Proceedings of the 27th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate, pages 749-764, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:lnopch:978-981-99-3626-7_58
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-99-3626-7_58
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:lnopch:978-981-99-3626-7_58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.