IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/lnopch/978-981-96-9697-0_84.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

A Comparative Study of Post-epidemic Cultural and Tourism Policies Among China, the UK and the US Based on Public Policy Analysis and Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Xiuxu Fan

    (Beijing Institute of Graphic Communication)

  • Liang Wang

    (Beijing Institute of Graphic Communication)

Abstract

This study makes a comprehensive review of the cultural and tourism policies formulated by China, the United States and the United Kingdom after the end of the epidemic. It is found that culture and tourism policies are complementary and integrated in many dimensions, but there are also significant differences. Based on this, this study provides targeted conclusions and suggestions to promote the effective implementation of policies and the coordinated development of the industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiuxu Fan & Liang Wang, 2025. "A Comparative Study of Post-epidemic Cultural and Tourism Policies Among China, the UK and the US Based on Public Policy Analysis and Evaluation," Lecture Notes in Operations Research,, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:lnopch:978-981-96-9697-0_84
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-96-9697-0_84
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:lnopch:978-981-96-9697-0_84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.