IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/lnopch/978-3-032-23493-3_30.html

Evaluating Strategic Efficiency to Create Meaningful Futures: A Conceptual DEA Model for Comparing Higher Education Prioritization Across Contexts

Author

Listed:
  • Aldo Valencia

    (Northumbria University)

  • Violeta Cvetkoska

    (Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Faculty of Economics)

  • Bojan Kitanovikj

    (Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Faculty of Economics)

  • Ljupcho Eftimov

    (Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Faculty of Economics)

  • Alison Pearce

    (Northumbria University)

Abstract

Forward-looking and participatory approaches are critical to build organisational resilience in times of high uncertainty and ambiguity. Strategic prioritization plays a crucial role in institutional effectiveness, resource management, and long-term competitiveness. However, the efficiency with which higher education institutions (HEIs) set and execute strategic priorities varies across different economic, cultural, and institutional landscapes. Identifying the factors that contribute to or hinder efficient prioritization is essential for improving decision-making processes and ensuring sustainable development in higher education. This study conceptualizes a Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model to evaluate the efficiency of strategic prioritization across HEIs in diverse global contexts. Focusing on institutions from Chile, Estonia, Ireland, Kenya, North Macedonia, Poland, Slovenia, South Korea, and the United Kingdom, we assess how external factors, cultural dimensions (power distance, individualism/collectivism), economic indicators (GDP per capita, economic freedom), and institutional characteristics (regulatory quality, digital infrastructure quality) influence strategic alignment. Composite prioritization scores, based on two expert focus groups will serve as outputs, enabling a comparative efficiency analysis. Benchmarking and slack analysis are expected to provide insights into prioritization gaps and highlight opportunities for improving strategic decision-making in HEIs. The forthcoming results of this study are particularly relevant to higher education leaders, policymakers, and researchers in operational and strategic management to refine governance and optimize institutional performance. Furthermore, this research contributes to the analytics field by showcasing DEA’s applicability in evaluating and improving strategic efficiency in complex, multi-context environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Aldo Valencia & Violeta Cvetkoska & Bojan Kitanovikj & Ljupcho Eftimov & Alison Pearce, 2026. "Evaluating Strategic Efficiency to Create Meaningful Futures: A Conceptual DEA Model for Comparing Higher Education Prioritization Across Contexts," Lecture Notes in Operations Research,, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:lnopch:978-3-032-23493-3_30
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-23493-3_30
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:lnopch:978-3-032-23493-3_30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.