IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/lnopch/978-3-032-23493-3_22.html

Large Language Models for Fake News Detection in Business Intelligence Pipelines: A Comparative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Alaa Marshan

    (University of Surrey)

  • Athina Ioaanou

    (University of Surrey)

  • Colin Fu

    (University College London)

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the profound impact of misinformation on business operations, particularly in supply chain decision-making and crisis response. As organizations increasingly integrate real-time news and social media content into Business Intelligence (BI) systems, the need for automated tools that can filter out unreliable information has become urgent. This paper investigates the integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into BI pipelines to detect fake news before it influences business decisions. We compare two fine-tuning techniques, (1) a Scoring approach, which instructs LLMs to assess news articles based on linguistic, sentiment, and contextual features, and (2) Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), which equips LLMs with external knowledge retrieval to ground their analysis. Using the COVID19-FNIR dataset of true and fake pandemic-related news, we evaluate both OpenAI’s GPT and Microsoft’s Phi-3 models. Both the Scoring-based fine-tuning approach and the Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipeline were implemented using a standardised training configuration. Fine-tuning employed LoRA adapters with a learning rate of 2e-5, batch size of 8, and a three-epoch training schedule, selected based on validation loss convergence. Evaluation metrics included accuracy, F1-score, and calibration error to capture both classification performance and reliability of predictions. Results show that the RAG method significantly improves fake news detection accuracy (over 92%), while the Scoring technique provides better interpretability for enterprise users. We discuss the trade-offs between accuracy and explainability and demonstrate how each method can enhance BI systems by improving data quality and trust in analytic outputs. Furthermore, we explore how these techniques generalize beyond COVID-19 to broader domains such as finance, supply chains, and crisis communication. Building on these insights, the paper introduces a practical, organization-ready framework for integrating LLM-based misinformation detection into existing business intelligence pipelines. The framework outlines steps for data ingestion, operationalization of organizational scoring dimensions, model selection (Scoring vs. RAG), deployment, and continuous monitoring. This provides a clear and actionable blueprint for businesses seeking to strengthen information quality assurance using modern LLM technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Alaa Marshan & Athina Ioaanou & Colin Fu, 2026. "Large Language Models for Fake News Detection in Business Intelligence Pipelines: A Comparative Study," Lecture Notes in Operations Research,, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:lnopch:978-3-032-23493-3_22
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-23493-3_22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:lnopch:978-3-032-23493-3_22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.