IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/lnichp/978-3-032-08483-5_18.html

Transparency of Algorithmic Control Systems and Worker Judgments

In: Digital Innovation and Organizational Transformation

Author

Listed:
  • Maximilian Kempf

    (Technical University of Darmstadt)

  • Filip Simić

    (Technical University of Darmstadt)

  • Armin Alizadeh

    (Technical University of Darmstadt, Information Systems and Electronic Services)

  • Alexander Benlian

    (Technical University of Darmstadt, Information Systems and Electronic Services)

Abstract

The use of algorithms to guide worker behavior, referred to as algorithmic control (AC), is increasingly prevalent in organizations. Despite its potential operational benefits, prior research indicates that workers often struggle with the opaque nature of such systems. Our research aims to explore how workers perceive, judge, and react to AC systems when exposed to two distinct facets of algorithmic transparency (AT): input and transformation AT. Through an experimental study with 121 participants, we provide empirical evidence that increased transparency about the algorithm’s transformation process significantly enhances workers’ perceived AT, which in turn positively impacts workers’ judgments and, ultimately, their continuance intention and acceptance of an AC system. In doing so, we provide practical recommendations for organizations to mitigate the adverse effects associated with algorithmic control.

Suggested Citation

  • Maximilian Kempf & Filip Simić & Armin Alizadeh & Alexander Benlian, 2026. "Transparency of Algorithmic Control Systems and Worker Judgments," Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organization, in: Christoph M. Flath & Gunther Gust & Frédéric Thiesse & Axel Winkelmann (ed.), Digital Innovation and Organizational Transformation, pages 263-279, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:lnichp:978-3-032-08483-5_18
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-08483-5_18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:lnichp:978-3-032-08483-5_18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.