IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/lnichp/978-3-032-08483-5_1.html

Addressing the Schema Representation Problem in Process Models Using Petri Nets—First Results Illustrated by the Dining Philosophers Problem

In: Digital Innovation and Organizational Transformation

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastian Stephan

    (German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI)
    Saarland University)

  • Josip Lovrekovic

    (German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI)
    Saarland University)

  • Peter Fettke

    (German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI)
    Saarland University)

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce the schema representation problem using the example of dining philosophers: The difference between a system model of five eating philosophers and a schema model for a set of eating philosophers is of major importance. In a Petri net model, each philosopher and each fork would be considered as separate entities with their relating states and transitions. However, this approach lacks due to scalability and dynamic behavior, as adding more philosophers and forks significantly increases the model’s size. To model any set of dining philosophers, a Petri net schema is useful. However, there is no modeling technique to model an infinite set of philosophers and forks, and to access its single elements. To address this problem, we provide the elm-notation, which allows us to dynamically unfold and aggregate any sets whereby behavior can be described for each philosopher and fork on schema level.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastian Stephan & Josip Lovrekovic & Peter Fettke, 2026. "Addressing the Schema Representation Problem in Process Models Using Petri Nets—First Results Illustrated by the Dining Philosophers Problem," Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organization, in: Christoph M. Flath & Gunther Gust & Frédéric Thiesse & Axel Winkelmann (ed.), Digital Innovation and Organizational Transformation, pages 3-10, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:lnichp:978-3-032-08483-5_1
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-08483-5_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:lnichp:978-3-032-08483-5_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.