Author
Listed:
- Evgeny Kuzmin
(Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences)
- Viktoriia S. Bondareva
(Kyrgyz-Russian Slavic University named after B.N. Yeltsin)
- Akbar Shodiyev
(Termez University of Economics and Service
Tashkent Institute of Irrigation and Agricultural Mechanization Engineers (TIIAME)
Diplomat University)
- Ilyos Ochilov
(Tashkent State University of Economics)
Abstract
The modern economy faces the necessity of continuously reassessing the factors that determine labor productivity growth. This study presents a cross-country analysis of the impact of digitalization, innovation potential, institutional development, and economic structural composition on labor productivity across 17 countries during the period from 2015 to 2024. The primary aim of the research is to identify robust determinants and evaluate the heterogeneity of digital transformation effects depending on the country profile. The analysis incorporates five explanatory variables: digital competitiveness index, artificial intelligence investment as a percentage of GDP, global innovation index, global competitiveness index, and the share of industry in GDP. Labor productivity per hour worked, expressed in USD adjusted for purchasing power parity at constant 2017 prices, serves as the dependent variable. The methodology involves the construction of an ordinary least squares (OLS) regression model, multicollinearity diagnostics using the variance inflation factor (VIF), dimensionality reduction via principal component analysis (PCA), and country stratification based on k-means cluster analysis. Separate regression models were constructed for each cluster group. The results indicate that the most significant predictors of labor productivity across the full sample are global competitiveness (positive effect), innovation index (negative effect), and digital competitiveness (negative effect). Investments in artificial intelligence and digital competitiveness yielded statistically unstable or paradoxical effects, possibly indicating the presence of time lags, institutional barriers, or structural heterogeneity. The cluster-based models reveal differentiated trajectories of digital transformation. In digitally mature countries, labor productivity is primarily driven by global competitiveness (positive) and a declining share of industry (negative). In contrast, for countries with transitional digital structures, digital and global competitiveness positively influence productivity, while innovation has a restraining effect. These findings underscore the heterogeneity of digitalization effects and highlight the necessity of differentiated digital policy approaches. The conclusions drawn from this study may serve as a basis for developing strategies aimed at enhancing economic performance in the context of a digital economy.
Suggested Citation
Evgeny Kuzmin & Viktoriia S. Bondareva & Akbar Shodiyev & Ilyos Ochilov, 2025.
"Digitalization, Innovation, and Competitiveness: Insights from a Cross-Country Analysis of Labor Productivity Effects,"
Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organization,,
Springer.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:lnichp:978-3-032-00118-4_17
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-00118-4_17
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:lnichp:978-3-032-00118-4_17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.