IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/lnichp/978-3-031-87880-0_12.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Assessing Operational Business-IT Alignment for Architecture Improvement

Author

Listed:
  • Pascal André

    (Nantes University - CNRS/LS2N)

  • Ali Benjilany

    (Nantes University - CNRS/LS2N)

  • Hugo Bruneliere

    (IMT Atlantique - CNRS/LS2N)

  • Dalila Tamzalit

    (Nantes University - CNRS/LS2N)

Abstract

Business-IT alignment (BITA) remains a challenging topic for enterprise architects. This is notably the case of operational BITA that focuses on the alignment between business processes and IT applications. In this context, a major challenge is to determine the level of alignment between these Business and IT layers. Existing approaches already propose to assess this alignment, but they are often context-specific. Moreover, no approach intends to combine various assessment means for a more in-depth evaluation of the alignment. As a solution, we propose an alignment assessment approach combining different means (metrics, consistency rules, and anti-patterns). We also provide a methodology that integrates this approach by relying on an established cartography (expressing the current state of alignment) and proposes a corresponding redress step. This cartography is composed of Business and IT models, and of explicit links between them. Both the proposed methodology and assessment approach are illustrated on two case studies for validation purposes. In the reported experiments, we considered six metrics, two consistency rules, and four anti-patterns.

Suggested Citation

  • Pascal André & Ali Benjilany & Hugo Bruneliere & Dalila Tamzalit, 2025. "Assessing Operational Business-IT Alignment for Architecture Improvement," Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organization,, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:lnichp:978-3-031-87880-0_12
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-87880-0_12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:lnichp:978-3-031-87880-0_12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.