IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/lnichp/978-3-031-32436-9_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Fairness Requirement in AI Engineering – A Review on Current Research and Future Directions

In: Sustainability in Software Engineering and Business Information Management

Author

Listed:
  • Nga Pham

    (Dainam University
    VNU University of Engineering and Technology)

  • Hung Pham-Ngoc

    (VNU University of Engineering and Technology)

  • Anh Nguyen-Duc

    (University of South Eastern Norway)

Abstract

Currently, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been applied to the same development techniques as software. There have been opinions that the evaluation of the quality of AI software should be based on the element of AI software fairness. An unfair AI software is considered shoddy software. There is a lot of recent researches intending to make AI software fair, accountable and transparent. Therefore, it is extremely important to consider the issue of fairness while analyzing this kind of software. A big question is also raised. What is fair AI software? How to measure the fairness of a given AI software and how to test that fairness? This paper will summarize the concepts of fairness in AI software that have been introduced as well as the method of measuring and testing fairness in AI software according to those concepts. Based on an ad-hoc literature review, we summarize some recent findings in the area of requirement engineering for AI fairness and point out some research gaps.

Suggested Citation

  • Nga Pham & Hung Pham-Ngoc & Anh Nguyen-Duc, 2023. "Fairness Requirement in AI Engineering – A Review on Current Research and Future Directions," Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organization, in: Varun Gupta & Luis Rubalcaba & Chetna Gupta & Thomas Hanne (ed.), Sustainability in Software Engineering and Business Information Management, pages 3-13, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:lnichp:978-3-031-32436-9_1
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-32436-9_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:lnichp:978-3-031-32436-9_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.