IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/lnichp/978-3-030-88900-5_10.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

On Electrode Layout in EEG Studies: A Limitation of Consumer-Grade EEG Instruments

In: Information Systems and Neuroscience

Author

Listed:
  • Gernot R. Müller-Putz

    (Graz University of Technology)

  • Ursula Tunkowitsch

    (Graz University of Technology)

  • Randall K. Minas

    (University of Hawaii)

  • Alan R. Dennis

    (Kelley School of Business, Indiana University)

  • René Riedl

    (University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria
    Johannes Kepler University)

Abstract

There is an ongoing discussion in the NeuroIS (Neuro-Information-Systems) discipline on whether consumer-grade EEG instruments are as suitable for scientific research as research-grade instruments. Considering the increasing adoption of consumer-grade instruments along with the fact that many NeuroIS EEG papers used such tools, this debate is fundamental. We report on a study in which we contrasted a 61-channel EEG recording with a 14-channel recording that should simulate the electrode layout of the EPOC headset, the presumably worldwide most widely used consumer-grade tool. The contrast was carried out based on topographic mapping, because this kind of EEG data analysis does not only play a significant role in cognitive neuroscience, but also in NeuroIS research. Our findings show noticeable differences in the topoplots between both conditions. The current research results are limited by the fact that our task context is a non-IS context (i.e., upper limb movements). Hence, future research should validate our results based on IS tasks and situations in order to confirm, revise, or falsify the present results.

Suggested Citation

  • Gernot R. Müller-Putz & Ursula Tunkowitsch & Randall K. Minas & Alan R. Dennis & René Riedl, 2021. "On Electrode Layout in EEG Studies: A Limitation of Consumer-Grade EEG Instruments," Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organization, in: Fred D. Davis & René Riedl & Jan vom Brocke & Pierre-Majorique Léger & Adriane B. Randolph & Gernot (ed.), Information Systems and Neuroscience, pages 90-95, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:lnichp:978-3-030-88900-5_10
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-88900-5_10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:lnichp:978-3-030-88900-5_10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.