Author
Abstract
This within-subjects study investigated the effect of small enclosed spaces on human brain activation during a simple word encoding task. A small and movable wooden box was designed, inside of which participants were exposed to visually presented words while asked to decide whether or not the first and last letters of each word were in alphabetical order. Simultaneously, brain activity was recorded via EEG. Respective encoding-related brain potentials were contrasted to an open space condition with the same task instruction. Data processing revealed that brain potentials were significantly more negative going at left lateral-frontal electrode locations when participants were inside the box compared to outside. First, we interpret this finding to show an increase in frontal brain activity reflecting higher amygdala activation while inside the box, i.e. a bottom-up process. Given the enclosed nature of this condition, one may assume fear-related brain responses to occur, reflecting projections from the amygdaloid complex to the frontal cortex. A second interpretation is that the increased lateral-frontal activity while inside the box stems from frontal regulation of negative affective responses, i.e. a top-down process, associated with the enclosed space. A third alternative interpretation is that attentional processes mediated by the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) are active on higher levels while inside the box versus outside. Under the assumption that the event-related potential (ERP) differences are indeed fear-related, we want to suggest a new psychological construct that is subsequently introduced as implicit claustrophobia, i.e. a non-conscious fear of enclosed spaces.
Suggested Citation
Alessandra Natascha Flöck & Peter Walla, 2020.
"Think Outside the Box: Small, Enclosed Spaces Alter Brain Activity as Measured with Electroencephalography (EEG),"
Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organization, in: Fred D. Davis & René Riedl & Jan vom Brocke & Pierre-Majorique Léger & Adriane B. Randolph & Thomas (ed.), Information Systems and Neuroscience, pages 24-30,
Springer.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:lnichp:978-3-030-60073-0_3
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-60073-0_3
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:lnichp:978-3-030-60073-0_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.