IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/lnichp/978-3-030-01087-4_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Paying Attention Doesn’t Always Pay off: The Effects of High Attention Load on Evaluations of Ideas

In: Information Systems and Neuroscience

Author

Listed:
  • Goran Calic

    (McMaster University)

  • Nour El Shamy

    (McMaster University)

  • Khaled Hassanein

    (McMaster University)

  • Scott Watter

    (McMaster University)

Abstract

Creativity is a key driver of success for organizations in the digital age. Managers engaged in evaluating the creativity of new ideas are often subject to a myriad of technology-mediated distractors that compete for their attention. In this work in progress paper, we investigate whether attentional overload results in an upward bias for IT-mediated creativity evaluations. We report on promising early results that examines this phenomenon and set out to study its implications on IT design complexity.

Suggested Citation

  • Goran Calic & Nour El Shamy & Khaled Hassanein & Scott Watter, 2019. "Paying Attention Doesn’t Always Pay off: The Effects of High Attention Load on Evaluations of Ideas," Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organization, in: Fred D. Davis & René Riedl & Jan vom Brocke & Pierre-Majorique Léger & Adriane B. Randolph (ed.), Information Systems and Neuroscience, pages 65-72, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:lnichp:978-3-030-01087-4_8
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-01087-4_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paritosh Chandra Sinha, 2023. "Attention to the Fads and Fashions in the Indian Stock Markets During COVID-19," Vision, , vol. 27(2), pages 202-224, April.
    2. Yossi Maaravi & Ben Heller & Yael Shoham & Shay Mohar & Baruch Deutsch, 2021. "Ideation in the digital age: literature review and integrative model for electronic brainstorming," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(6), pages 1431-1464, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:lnichp:978-3-030-01087-4_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.