IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/isochp/978-3-319-97511-5_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Risk Management in Lean & Green Supply Chain: A Novel Fuzzy Linguistic Risk Assessment Approach

In: Lean and Green Supply Chain Management

Author

Listed:
  • Turan Paksoy

    (Konya Technical University)

  • Ahmet Çalik

    (KTO Karatay University)

  • Abdullah Yildizbaşi

    (Yıldırım Beyazıt University)

  • Sandra Huber

    (Helmut Schmidt University)

Abstract

In today’s world, the pressure of competition considerably changed because of the increasing pressure of market competition, changes in customer expectations due to global warming and the globalization of the economy. Growing pressures in supply chain activities urge to companies to adopt new approaches by reducing waste and planning environmental friendly processes, such as recycling, reuse, and remanufacturing. There have been several studies proposed that lean activities can help make the case for environmental impact reduction to companies. Thus, most companies have reorganized their supply chain by the integrate the green activities through the balance of lean and green models simultaneously. According to this idea, they started to transfer some of their business process activities to external companies to be leaner & greener. Outsourcing can lead to cost reductions, meeting customer demand, reducing waste, gaining more flexibility and sharing of risks. Although outsourcing in the lean & green supply chain management brings benefits, companies can confront various risks. From this viewpoint, we propose a new fuzzy linguistic risk assessment approach to assess suppliers’ risks according to several criteria such as experience level of suppliers, criticality level of parts supplied, manufacturing technical requirements and complexity of parts supplied, effect of the deviations on the final product function, flexibility of suppliers, green activity level of suppliers, occupational health and safety risk, environmental risk and cooperation level of suppliers. For this purpose, an integrated solution approach that consists of four stages is applied. At the first stage, the relative weights of the criteria are calculated by asking the decision makers with the help of the pair-wise comparison matrix. At the second stage, suppliers’ scores are evaluated according to the selected criteria using linguistic variables. At the third stage, risk levels of suppliers are calculated. At the fourth stage, suppliers are assigned to risk groups according to their risk level action plans are determined. Finally, a numerical example is presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Turan Paksoy & Ahmet Çalik & Abdullah Yildizbaşi & Sandra Huber, 2019. "Risk Management in Lean & Green Supply Chain: A Novel Fuzzy Linguistic Risk Assessment Approach," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Turan Paksoy & Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber & Sandra Huber (ed.), Lean and Green Supply Chain Management, pages 75-100, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:isochp:978-3-319-97511-5_3
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-97511-5_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Satyendra Kumar Sharma & Praveen Ranjan Srivastava & Ajay Kumar & Anil Jindal & Shivam Gupta, 2023. "Supply chain vulnerability assessment for manufacturing industry," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 326(2), pages 653-683, July.
    2. Madhukar Chhimwal & Saurabh Agrawal & Girish Kumar, 2021. "Measuring Circular Supply Chain Risk: A Bayesian Network Methodology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-22, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:isochp:978-3-319-97511-5_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.