IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/isochp/978-3-319-78242-3_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

How Well Can High-Throughput Screening Tests Results Predict Whether Chemicals Cause Cancer in Mice and Rats?

In: Causal Analytics for Applied Risk Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Louis Anthony Cox Jr.

    (Cox Associates)

  • Douglas A. Popken

    (Cox Associates)

  • Richard X. Sun

    (Cox Associates)

Abstract

Over the past half century, an enduring intellectual and technical challenge for risk analysts, statisticians, toxicologists, and experts in artificial intelligence, machine-learning and bioinformatics has been to predict in vivo biological responses to realistic exposures, with demonstrably useful accuracy and confidence, from in vitro and chemical structure data. The common goal of many applied research efforts has been to devise and validate algorithms that give trustworthy predictions of whether and by how much realistic exposures to chemicals change probabilities of adverse health responses. This chapter examines recent, promising results suggesting that high-throughput screening (HTS) assay data can be used to predict in vivo classifications of rodent carcinogenicity for certain pesticides. Anticipating the focus on evaluation analytics for assessing the performance of systems, policies, and interventions in Chaps. 9 and 10 , it also undertakes an independent reanalysis of the underlying data to determine how well this encouraging claim can be replicated and supported when the same data are analyzed using slightly different methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Louis Anthony Cox Jr. & Douglas A. Popken & Richard X. Sun, 2018. "How Well Can High-Throughput Screening Tests Results Predict Whether Chemicals Cause Cancer in Mice and Rats?," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Causal Analytics for Applied Risk Analysis, chapter 0, pages 375-395, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:isochp:978-3-319-78242-3_8
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-78242-3_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:isochp:978-3-319-78242-3_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.