IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/isochp/978-3-319-78242-3_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Quantitative Risk Assessment of Human Risks of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from Swine Operations

In: Causal Analytics for Applied Risk Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Louis Anthony Cox Jr.

    (Cox Associates)

  • Douglas A. Popken

    (Cox Associates)

  • Richard X. Sun

    (Cox Associates)

Abstract

Describing quantitatively how large a risk is provides crucial information for helping to set risk management priorities. This chapter applies descriptive analytics to assess the size of the human health risks from a particular source. It continues the theme begun in Chap. 5 of examining human health risks from antibiotic-resistant infectious bacteria, but focuses specifically on long-standing concerns expressed by the public health community, news media, and members of the general public that methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) transmitted from pigs to humans may harm human health. For readers not interested in details of this application, a brief summary is that previous studies of the prevalence and dynamics of swine-associated (ST398) MRSA have sampled MRSA at discrete points in the presumed causal chain leading from swine to human patients, including sampling bacteria from live pigs, retail meats, farm workers, and hospital patients. This chapter integrates available data from several sources to construct a conservative (plausible upper-bound) probability estimate for the quantitative human health harm (MRSA infections and fatalities) arising from ST398-MRSA from pigs. The estimated plausible upper bounds are approximately one excess human infection per year among all U.S. pig farm workers, and one human infection per 31 years among the remaining total population of the U.S., assuming that bacteria transmission events not yet observed are possible. The true risks may be smaller (possibly zero for members of the general population). Putting rough numerical bounds on the size of the risk such as “less than one case per 300 million people per decade” can help to engage System 2 thinking (cognitive, slow, deliberative; see Chap. 12 ) about costs and benefits of risk-reducing interventions; whereas leaving the risk unquantified is more likely to engage System 1 thinking (intuitive, quick, emotional; see Chap. 12 ), which typically reacts very strongly and adversely to the qualitative idea of contamination of food with invisible, harmful microbes.

Suggested Citation

  • Louis Anthony Cox Jr. & Douglas A. Popken & Richard X. Sun, 2018. "Quantitative Risk Assessment of Human Risks of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from Swine Operations," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Causal Analytics for Applied Risk Analysis, chapter 0, pages 333-352, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:isochp:978-3-319-78242-3_6
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-78242-3_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:isochp:978-3-319-78242-3_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.