IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/isochp/978-3-319-18087-8_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Classic Assumptions Versus Simulation Practice

In: Design and Analysis of Simulation Experiments

Author

Listed:
  • Jack P. C. Kleijnen

    (Tilburg University)

Abstract

This chapter is organized as follows. Section 3.1 summarizes the classic assumptions of regression analysis, which were given in the preceding chapter. Section 3.2 discusses multiple simulation outputs (responses, performance measures), which are usual in simulation practice. Section 3.3 addresses possible nonnormality of either the simulation output itself or the regression residuals (fitting errors), including tests of normality, normalizing transformations of the simulation output, and jackknifing and bootstrapping of nonnormal output. Section 3.4 covers variance heterogeneity of the simulation output, which is usual in random simulation. Section 3.5 discusses cross-correlated simulation outputs created through common random numbers (CRN); the use of CRN is popular in random simulation. Section 3.6 discusses the validation of estimated regression models, including the coefficient of determination R 2 and the adjusted coefficient R adj 2 $$R_{\mbox{ adj}}^{2}$$ , and cross-validation; this section also discusses how classic low-order polynomial metamodels (detailed in the preceding chapter) may be improved in practice. Section 3.7 summarizes the major conclusions of this chapter. The chapter ends with solutions for the exercises, and a long list with references for further study.

Suggested Citation

  • Jack P. C. Kleijnen, 2015. "Classic Assumptions Versus Simulation Practice," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Design and Analysis of Simulation Experiments, edition 2, chapter 3, pages 83-133, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:isochp:978-3-319-18087-8_3
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-18087-8_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ana-Petrina Păun & Claudia Isac, 2016. "Financial Instruments for the Protection of Mothers," Annals of the University of Petrosani, Economics, University of Petrosani, Romania, vol. 16(1), pages 199-206.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:isochp:978-3-319-18087-8_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.