IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/isochp/978-3-032-19284-4_9.html

Theoretical Foundation for FITradeoff Method

In: Multi-Criteria Decision Making with Partial Preference Information

Author

Listed:
  • Adiel Teixeira de Almeida

    (Federal University of Pernambuco)

  • Eduarda Asfora Frej

    (Federal University of Pernambuco)

  • Lucia Reis Peixoto Roselli

    (Federal University of Pernambuco)

  • Jonatas Araújo de Almeida

    (Federal University of Pernambuco)

  • Ana Paula Cabral Seixas Costa

    (Federal University of Pernambuco)

  • Danielle Costa Morais

    (Federal University of Pernambuco)

Abstract

The FITradeoff method is one of the partial preference information methods in MCDM/A that is most applied. This chapter presents the theoretical foundation for the FITradeoff method. It is essential to understand this foundation to ensure the correct application of the method and a coherent interpretation of its results. This strengthens the credibility of the decision process. Additionally, when necessary, an in-depth knowledge of the foundation of the method identifies possibilities for adapting it in conjunction with other approaches consistently with its axioms. The two paradigms for preference modeling, elicitation by decomposition and holistic evaluation, are analyzed. For the former, it is demonstrated that the heuristics for the sequence of questions accelerates the elicitation process. This eliminates contradictions in the DM’s statements, and thus corrects possible inconsistencies that might occur in the elicitation procedure. Finally, an analysis is presented on the use of the DM’s preferences collected and how they are used to find the solution for each type of problematic.

Suggested Citation

  • Adiel Teixeira de Almeida & Eduarda Asfora Frej & Lucia Reis Peixoto Roselli & Jonatas Araújo de Almeida & Ana Paula Cabral Seixas Costa & Danielle Costa Morais, 2026. "Theoretical Foundation for FITradeoff Method," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Multi-Criteria Decision Making with Partial Preference Information, chapter 9, pages 149-177, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:isochp:978-3-032-19284-4_9
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-19284-4_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:isochp:978-3-032-19284-4_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.