IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/isochp/978-3-030-44866-0_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Investment in New Power Plants Under Environmental Policies

In: Analysis of Environmental Policy in the Power Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Yihsu Chen

    (University of California, Santa Cruz)

  • Afzal S. Siddiqui

    (University College London
    Stockholm University)

  • Makoto Tanaka

    (National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies (GRIPS))

Abstract

Economists have long been in favor of deregulating or restructuring the power sector in order to promote competition. One of the motivations for doing so is to make the industry more competitive through which investment decisions, such as generation capacity and transmission expansion, are driven by market signals. The so-called market signals include those provided by environmental and energy market-based instruments, e.g., cap-and-trade (C&T) CO $$_2$$ emissionscap-and-trade mechanism policy and renewable portfolio standards (RPS)Renewable portfolio standard. This chapter focuses on generation-capacity investment in the power sector. It first introduces screening-curve analysisScreening-curve analysis, a common approach used by the power industry to gauge which technology is economically more (or less) favorable for given capacity factors. Inferring from existing studies, we then focus on open-loop formulations, assuming that producers simultaneously make investment and operational decisions for two reasons. First, the solutions of open-loop and closed-loop formulations have been shown to be equivalent under perfect competition. Second, a long-run equilibrium under perfect competition market entails the notion of the zero-profit condition unless there are significant entry barriers. Solutions to imperfectly competitive oligopoly formulations based on the concept of subgame perfect equilibrium (SPE) exist, but their implementations are limited to small-scale case studies, mostly theoretical studies with limited applicability to any realistic system. Thus, we present open-loop oligopoly capacity-investment models and compare their solutions to those under perfect competition. The chapter then introduces a Stackelberg leader–follower competition in which one of the firms is designated as the leader who possesses opportunities for investing in new capacity while other firms are price takers and not allowed to invest. The resulting mathematical program with equilibrium constraints (MPEC),Mathematical program with equilibrium constraints with followers’ first-order conditions embedded in the leader’s problem, is then recast into a mixed-integer quadratic program (MIQP)Mixed-integer quadratic program. The chapter concludes with discussions on possible extensions, including modeling price-containment policies, e.g., permit-price ceiling and floor, that are currently used by the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI)Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative in the U.S. and the California C&TCO $$_2$$ emissionscap-and-trade mechanism program.

Suggested Citation

  • Yihsu Chen & Afzal S. Siddiqui & Makoto Tanaka, 2020. "Investment in New Power Plants Under Environmental Policies," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Analysis of Environmental Policy in the Power Sector, chapter 0, pages 111-151, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:isochp:978-3-030-44866-0_6
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-44866-0_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:isochp:978-3-030-44866-0_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.