IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/isochp/978-1-4614-9512-3_17.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Using a Diagnostic to Focus Hospital Flow Improvement Strategies

In: Patient Flow

Author

Listed:
  • Roger Resar

    (Institute for Healthcare Improvement)

Abstract

Current methods to evaluate hospital flow primarily measure micros-system issues, such as numbers of diversions from the ED, or how many patients are boarded in some way somewhere in the hospital, or specific delays in hospital units and annual admissions. The narrow focus on delays, although appropriate, generally leads to attempts at fixing a large system problem from the viewpoint of a micro-system. A newly developed hospital diagnostic that utilizes a broader view of flow can be used to evaluate how a hospital might best respond to delays, but also how to maximize the number of turns each bed generates in a year. The diagnostic utilizes easily obtainable and commonly collected hospital metrics. The diagnostic allows a hospital to categorize itself depending on the number of bed turns and the efficiency of using those beds. Based on a self-evaluation a hospital can determine which improvement strategies would be most useful, or if ongoing improvement strategies are properly focused to achieve an ultimate goal of reduced delays and increased bed turns (the goal of 90 or more adjusted turns and a bed use efficiency of around 90 %). A business case for improvements can be based on increasing turns either by accommodation of more demand or by decreasing unneeded capacity. Improvements in throughput per bed allow leadership to justifiably focus resources on the appropriate change concepts. Serial measurements of the bed turns and bed utilization metric allow the organization to measure the effects of flow improvement strategies over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Roger Resar, 2013. "Using a Diagnostic to Focus Hospital Flow Improvement Strategies," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Randolph Hall (ed.), Patient Flow, edition 2, chapter 0, pages 413-427, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:isochp:978-1-4614-9512-3_17
    DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-9512-3_17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:isochp:978-1-4614-9512-3_17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.