IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/isochp/978-1-4614-9475-1_11.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Sensitivity Analysis

In: Mathematical and Computational Modeling of Tonality

Author

Listed:
  • Elaine Chew

    (Queen Mary University of London)

Abstract

The goal of this chapter is to present a systematic analysis of audio key-finding to determine the factors important to system design, and the selecting and evaluating of solutions. First, we present a basic audio key-finding system consisting of a Fuzzy Analysis technique and the Spiral Array Center of Effect Generator algorithm, with three key determination policies: the nearest-neighbor, the relative distance, and the average distance policy. An evaluation on 15-second excerpts of 410 classical pieces from a variety of stylistic periods shows that the average-distance key determination policy achieves a 79 % correct key identification rate, at least 8 % higher than the systems employing other key determination policies. Two examples are given to illustrate why audio key-finding could outperform symbolic key-finding, where precise pitch information is known. An analysis of the results by period shows that pieces from the romantic period may be the most challenging for key-finding. We next propose three extensions to the basic key-finding system—the modified Spiral Array approach, fundamental frequency identification, and post-weight balancing—to improve the performance at different stages of the system. The three extensions are evaluated using 15-second excerpts of recordings of Chopin’s Preludes for piano. Quantitative analyses of the results show that fundamental frequency identification provides the greatest system improvement in the first 8s, while modifying the representation model using audio frequency features leads to the best performance after 8s. Two case studies show detailed analyses of an example where all extended systems give the correct answer, and another where all systems were incorrect.

Suggested Citation

  • Elaine Chew, 2014. "Sensitivity Analysis," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Mathematical and Computational Modeling of Tonality, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 193-222, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:isochp:978-1-4614-9475-1_11
    DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-9475-1_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:isochp:978-1-4614-9475-1_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.