IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/isochp/978-1-4614-7279-7_13.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Criteria for Evaluating Group Decision-Making Methods

In: Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas L. Saaty

    (University of Pittsburgh)

  • Luis G. Vargas

    (University of Pittsburgh)

Abstract

In this chapter we are concerned with the development of criteria for evaluating different methods of group decision-making that range from the strictly technical, to the psychophysical and social, and finally, to the logical and scientific. Our purpose is to identify similarities and differences with the aim of showing from such wide consideration which method is more attractive, and is likely to gain greater attention both in academia and in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas L. Saaty & Luis G. Vargas, 2013. "Criteria for Evaluating Group Decision-Making Methods," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process, edition 2, chapter 0, pages 295-318, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:isochp:978-1-4614-7279-7_13
    DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-7279-7_13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:isochp:978-1-4614-7279-7_13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.