IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/isochp/978-0-387-33987-0_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Stabilizing Social Security for the Long-Term

In: Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process

Author

Listed:
  • Valorie Checque
  • Larry E. Nolph
  • Brian R. Patt

Abstract

7. Conclusion Among the major factors influencing the results are: Approximately 90% of all wages were subject to Social Security withholding in 1980; by 2004, that percentage had slipped to 85%. In 1935, Social Security was designed to support older Americans who were dependent and beyond their productive period, originally calculated to begin at age 65, when men had an average of 12 years ahead of them. Today, a 65-year-old man can expect to live for 17 more years (women, 20) — 5 years longer than original budget estimates. A system designed for men with 12 years ahead of them today would set the retirement age between 70 and 75 Given the relative scores under the additive model and the sensitivity analysis, the Raise the Ceiling and Raise the Retirement Age alternatives are almost identical in every respect, leaving each or a combination of the two as the optimal alternatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Valorie Checque & Larry E. Nolph & Brian R. Patt, 2006. "Stabilizing Social Security for the Long-Term," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process, chapter 0, pages 173-192, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:isochp:978-0-387-33987-0_9
    DOI: 10.1007/0-387-33987-6_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:isochp:978-0-387-33987-0_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.