IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/isbchp/978-981-95-6103-2_9.html

Trend and Pattern of Women’s Work in India, 1983–2024

In: Women and Work in India: Challenges, Opportunities and Perspectives for Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Alakh N. Sharma

    (Institute for Human Development (IHD))

  • Balwant Singh Mehta

    (Institute for Human Development (IHD))

Abstract

India’s women’s labour force participation rate has experienced substantial shifts over the past four decades. It fell from 44.8% in 1983 to 23.3% in 2018, then rose sharply to 41.7% in 2024, with women accounting for almost 70% of new entrants during this period. The recent rise is concentrated in rural areas, mainly in self-employment and unpaid family work in agriculture, where job quality remains poor. Men earn more than women across all employment categories, especially in self-employment and casual work. Occupational segregation also limits women to lower-skilled and lower-paid roles, while they remain underrepresented in higher-skilled and better-paid jobs. Educated young women continue to face high unemployment because of skill mismatch and limited availability of quality and aspirational jobs. The NEET rate for young women also remains high, reflecting poverty, restrictive social norms and inadequate access to decent work opportunities. Participation has increased, but persistent inequalities and poor job quality continue to constrain women’s economic prospects.

Suggested Citation

  • Alakh N. Sharma & Balwant Singh Mehta, 2026. "Trend and Pattern of Women’s Work in India, 1983–2024," India Studies in Business and Economics, in: Alakh N. Sharma & Aasha Kapur Mehta & Vandana Upadhyay (ed.), Women and Work in India: Challenges, Opportunities and Perspectives for Policy, chapter 9, pages 179-208, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:isbchp:978-981-95-6103-2_9
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-95-6103-2_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:isbchp:978-981-95-6103-2_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.