IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/isbchp/978-981-10-4208-9_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Postcolonial Evolution of Water Rights in India and the United States

In: Land Policies in India

Author

Listed:
  • Jesse J. Richardson

    (West Virginia University College of Law)

Abstract

Both India and the United States adopted the English common law for water rights upon gaining independence from England, although these events occurred 171 years apart (1776 in the United States, and 1947 in India). By the time India gained independence in 1947, many states in the United States had already evolved away from the English common law for water rights, particularly with respect to groundwater. However, to this day, most states in India have not altered the English common law, despite several prominent problems. This chapter explores the evolution (or lack thereof) of water rights in both countries and attempts to explain the stark differences. While courts in the United States often alter the English common law as to water rights, Indian courts seem restrained to do so. The overriding barrier in Indian law appears to come in the form of the Indian Easements Act, which arguably incorporates the English common law into statute. Both countries have passed policy or statutory provisions addressing allocation of water during times of scarcity. These provisions are remarkably similar. The chapter concludes by asserting that the time has come for Indian law to reject the English common for water rights and adopt laws and policies that more accurately reflect the reality of present day India.

Suggested Citation

  • Jesse J. Richardson, 2017. "Postcolonial Evolution of Water Rights in India and the United States," India Studies in Business and Economics, in: Sony Pellissery & Benjamin Davy & Harvey M. Jacobs (ed.), Land Policies in India, pages 51-70, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:isbchp:978-981-10-4208-9_3
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-4208-9_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:isbchp:978-981-10-4208-9_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.