IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/isbchp/978-981-10-3123-6_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Sustainable Development Concept in the WTO Jurisprudence: Contradictions and Connivance

In: Essays on Sustainability and Management

Author

Listed:
  • R. Rajesh Babu

    (Indian Institute of Management)

Abstract

The Marrakesh Agreement establishing the WTO (henceforth the WTO Agreement) is primarily a trade agreement, negotiated with the objective of promotion and progressive liberalisation of international trade. The WTO preamble recognises that the relations between member states in the field of trade and economic development should be conducted with a view to “raising standards of living, ensuring full employment and a large and steadily growing volume of real income and effective demand, and expanding the production of and trade in goods and services.” In this endeavour, it is acknowledged that states should allow for the “optimal use of the world’s resources in accordance with the objective of sustainable development, seeking both to protect and preserve the environment and to enhance the means for doing so in a manner consistent with their respective needs and concerns at different levels of economic development.” Beyond such an acknowledgement in the Preamble, the WTO and its covered agreements have largely ignored sustainable development as a binding obligation on the member states. It was perceived that such binding commitments were unnecessary as the WTO’s focus is trade governance. Besides, the developing countries were genuinely concerned that any substantive obligation on sustainable development, specifically in the context of environment and labour standards, shall have an adverse impact on their competitiveness vis-à-vis developed countries goods and services. More importantly, the prospective sustainable development measures may have a strong likelihood of being misused as a protectionist tool for trade gains by advanced economies that have already attained higher standard production and process methods and livelihood standards. These concerns and oppositions have left the “sustainability” objective in the WTO much to be desired. This chapter is an attempt to understand the interlinkages and conflicts in the context of the legal foundation of “sustainable development” in the WTO architecture, an organisation created to administer trade rules. The chapter shall look specifically at the approach taken by the WTO panel and the Appellate Body in interpreting and developing the concept. Special attention shall be given to the concerns of developing countries that have all along opposed inclusion of the sustainability concept without elaborate negotiation and consensus.

Suggested Citation

  • R. Rajesh Babu, 2017. "Sustainable Development Concept in the WTO Jurisprudence: Contradictions and Connivance," India Studies in Business and Economics, in: Runa Sarkar & Annapurna Shaw (ed.), Essays on Sustainability and Management, chapter 0, pages 53-73, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:isbchp:978-981-10-3123-6_4
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-3123-6_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:isbchp:978-981-10-3123-6_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.