IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/innchp/978-3-319-32392-3_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Integrating the Social Impacts into Risk Governance of Nanotechnology

In: Managing Risk in Nanotechnology

Author

Listed:
  • Vrishali Subramanian

    (Ca’ Foscari University of Venice)

  • Elena Semenzin

    (Ca’ Foscari University of Venice)

  • Alex Zabeo

    (Ca’ Foscari University of Venice)

  • Danail Hristozov

    (Ca’ Foscari University of Venice)

  • Ineke Malsch

    (Malsch TechnoValuation)

  • Peter Saling

    (BASF SE)

  • Toon Harmelen

    (TNO)

  • Tom Ligthart

    (TNO)

  • Antonio Marcomini

    (Ca’ Foscari University of Venice)

Abstract

Literature on the risk governance of nanotechnology places significant emphasis on the potential social impacts of nano-enabled products. However, there is limited information on which social impacts are relevant for nano-enabled products, and a methodology to monitor them to support risk governance is lacking. This chapter proposes a quantitative methodology based on Social Life Cycle Assessment (s-LCA) and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) to assess the social impacts of nano-enabled products through their life cycle. The s-LCA conceptual scheme (i.e. impacts and indicators for different stakeholders) is developed through an appraisal of literature on social impacts of products and Ethical, Legal and Social Impacts (ELSI) of nanotechnology, which is used to select suitable indicators in statistical databases. Five indicators associated with impacts of nano-enabled products, with two impacts in Worker category (professional training and non-fatal accidents) and three impacts in Community category (education, employment, research and development expenditure), were identified as relevant to compare nano-enabled products with similar functionality or nano-enabled product with their conventional counterpart. The indicators are organized within a conceptual scheme comprising benefits (education, employment and professional training) and costs (research and development expenditure and non-fatal accidents). A quantitative MCDA methodology is proposed and applied to a case study according to benefit-cost conceptual scheme. The gaps to be addressed to expand the future development of methodologies to assess social impacts of nano-enabled products are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Vrishali Subramanian & Elena Semenzin & Alex Zabeo & Danail Hristozov & Ineke Malsch & Peter Saling & Toon Harmelen & Tom Ligthart & Antonio Marcomini, 2016. "Integrating the Social Impacts into Risk Governance of Nanotechnology," Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management, in: Finbarr Murphy & Eamonn M. McAlea & Martin Mullins (ed.), Managing Risk in Nanotechnology, chapter 0, pages 51-70, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:innchp:978-3-319-32392-3_4
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-32392-3_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stella Stoycheva & Alex Zabeo & Lisa Pizzol & Danail Hristozov, 2022. "Socio-Economic Life Cycle-Based Framework for Safe and Sustainable Design of Engineered Nanomaterials and Nano-Enabled Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:innchp:978-3-319-32392-3_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.